No less than three analysts houses have posted
their global handset rankings for the last
quarter, and, despite losing overall market
share (as Nokia (NYSE: NOK) itself admitted last week ), Nokia still heads the the lists for IDC, Strategy Analytics and ABI Research — both in handsets overall and smartphones. Something
else that these results highlight: Android is not
necessarily a panacea for other handset makers
that are also losing market share.
BI Research says that 390 million mobile handsets were shipped in Q4, a 15.6 percent
increase compared to the same quarter a year
ago; IDC puts the number at 401.4 million units, at a rise of 17.9 percent; and Strategy Analytics says 400 million were shipped, at a rise of 16
percent. In all the lists, Nokia has managed to hold on to
its lead in shipped devices — not the same as sold devices, but a helpful measure in charting
market demand. The analysts are split when it
comes to how fast that lead is disappearing:
while ABI notes that Nokia ’ s share “ slid marginally ” , IDC and Strategy Analytics both put the decline around more notable six percent. All
of them more or less agree when they say the
Finnish giant now has between 30.8 and 31.7
percent market share today. Another theme that comes out of these results
is that Android ’ s growing popularity does not always translate into an instant win for all
handset makers that opt to use the platform in
their devices. Taking overall handset market
share, LG, Sony*Ericsson and Motorola— all of which make Android-based devices — lost market share according to all three analysts.
Two others making Android devices, Samsung and ZTE, both grew. HTC, which seems as ubiquitous as Samsung in some markets like
the U.S. didn’ t even appear in the top-device rankings — although it was given honourable mentions by all of them for being a fast riser. Taken independently, not one of the individual
Android-based developers made it into
Strategy Analytics ’ top smartphone vendors list — not even Samsung, the most successful of the current lot with hit devices like the Galaxy-S.
(They were Nokia, RIM (NSDQ: RIMM) and then
Apple (NSDQ: AAPL), followed by “ others” .) In fact, the only two smartphone-only device
makers that break into the top-five rankings
are Apple, which ranks as fourth in IDC ’ s and ABI ’ s reports and fifth in Strategy Analytics report; all giving it around a four percent share.
And RIM, which was fourth in Strategy
Analytics ’ rankings and fifth in ABI ’ s, with around a 3.7 percent share. Still, taken collectively, Android has been an
amazing vehicle to really kickstart mass-market
smartphone use. As Strategy Analytics ’ Neil Mawston, in his research note, points out,
Android device makers took market share
away from Nokia, RIM and Apple, who
together made up 67 percent of the market in
2010, a significant drop from 73 percent in
2009. But those handset makers relying on Android
for their future will ultimately need to think
about the wider portfolios, and what is being
wrapped around Android, if they hope to
remain large enough to achieve the kinds of
economies of scale that will keep costs down and margins high. Especially since there are so
many more handset makers like Micromax and Spice Mobile (heard of ‘ em?) using Android
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment